Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Saturday, August 3, 2024

The Spectral Representation of Stationary Processes: Bridging Gelfand-Vilenkin and Wiener-Khinchin



Introduction

At the heart of stochastic process theory lies a profound connection between time and frequency domains, elegantly captured by two fundamental theorems: the Gelfand-Vilenkin Spectral Representation Theorem and the Wiener-Khinchin Theorem. These results, while often presented separately, are intimately linked, offering complementary insights into the nature of stationary processes.

Gelfand-Vilenkin Theorem

The Gelfand-Vilenkin theorem provides a general, measure-theoretic framework for representing wide-sense stationary processes. Consider a stochastic process {X(t):tR} on a probability space (Ω,F,P). The theorem states that we can represent X(t) as:

X(t)=ReiωtdZ(ω)

Here, Z(ω) is a complex-valued process with orthogonal increments, and the integral is taken over the real line. This representation expresses the process as a superposition of complex exponentials, each contributing to the overall behavior of X(t) at different frequencies.

The key to understanding this representation lies in the spectral measure μ, which is defined by E[|Z(A)|2]=μ(A) for Borel sets A. This measure encapsulates the distribution of "energy" across different frequencies in the process.

Wiener-Khinchin Theorem

The Wiener-Khinchin theorem, in its classical form, states that for a wide-sense stationary process, the power spectral density S(ω) is the Fourier transform of the autocorrelation function:

S(ω)=RR(τ)eiωτdτ

Bridging the Theorems

The connection becomes clear when we recognize that the spectral measure μ from Gelfand-Vilenkin is related to the power spectral density S(ω) from Wiener-Khinchin by:

dμ(ω)=12πS(ω)dω

This relationship holds when S(ω) exists as a well-defined function. However, the beauty of the Gelfand-Vilenkin approach is that it allows for spectral measures that may not have a density, accommodating processes with more complex spectral structures.

Spectral Density Example

To illustrate the connection between spectral properties and sample path behavior, consider a process with a spectral density of the form:

S(ω)=11ω2,|ω|<1

This density has singularities at ω=±1, which profoundly influence the behavior of the process in the time domain:

- The sample paths will be continuous and infinitely differentiable.
- The paths will exhibit rapid oscillations, reflecting the strong presence of frequencies near ±1.
- The process will show a mix of components with different periods, with those corresponding to |ω| near 1 having larger amplitudes on average.
- The autocorrelation function is R(τ)=J0(τ), where J0 is the Bessel function of the first kind of order zero.

Frequency Interpretation

In our spectral density S(ω)=1/1ω2 with |ω|<1:

- ω represents angular frequency, with |ω| closer to 0 corresponding to longer-period components in the process.
- |ω| closer to 1 corresponds to shorter-period components.
- As |ω| approaches 1, S(ω) increases sharply, approaching infinity.
- This means components with |ω| near 1 contribute more strongly to the process variance.

Dirac Delta Example

Consider a spectral measure that is a Dirac delta function at ω=0.25:

S(ω)=δ(ω0.25)+δ(ω+0.25)

In this case:

- The process can be written as: X(t)=Acos(0.25t)+Bsin(0.25t)
- The covariance function is R(τ)=cos(0.25τ)
- The period of the covariance function is 2π/0.25=8π25.13
- This illustrates that a frequency of 0.25 in the spectral domain corresponds to a period of 8π in the time domain

This example demonstrates the crucial relationship: for any peak or concentration of spectral mass at a frequency ω0, we'll see corresponding oscillations in the covariance function with period 2π/ω0.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

The Devil’s Dice: How Chance and Determinism Seduce the Universe

The Devil’s Dice: How Chance and Determinism Seduce the Universe The Devil’s Dice: How Chance and Determini...